By Jason Murphey

I have recently written about bills from the last legislative session which mostly escape wide public purview but contain far reaching policy. The news has been mostly positive as I have either described harmful bills which were defeated, or good policy which won approval.

Now for some bad news.

I have observed the tendency for state officials to authorize a new super layer of regionalized government. This layer of government grows as state laws allow local governments to come together to form new regional government entities which are insulated from the immediate purview of the taxpayer. The primary constituency of the regionalized entity isn't the voter, but other government entities.

Cities and counties currently possess the ability to form new government entities which oversee transportation issues within that city or county. These entities may fund themselves through a 2% sales tax assessment. Until now, an entity's jurisdiction could not exceed the jurisdiction of the cities or counties which formed it.

This restriction partly helped voters to keep the transportation government entity in check because local taxpayers can always elect new officials if/when the transportation entity got out of control. The newly elected officials could take action to rein in the entity because the officers would probably be the local elected officials or their direct appointees.

The restriction also made it a little less likely that the transportation entity would avail itself of the 2% sales tax because the tax would conflict with the city or county's tax policy.

House Bill 2480 changed this. Transportation entities are now allowed to include parts of their own unique district within the various cities and unincorporated areas, but not necessarily entire cities. These entities may now be formed according to arbitrary and capricious boundaries.

These regional government entities are now less likely to represent the voters. For example, let's assume a regionalized transportation district is formed representing Edmond and Piedmont and connected through a part of the Deer Creek area. Let's say the entity takes an action which isn't popular in the Deer Creek area, but is popular in Piedmont and Edmond. Those who live in Deer Creek simply aren't likely to have their voices heard because they do not have a majority of seats on the regionalized board or the direct ability to vote on the board members. Those voters will have little to no say in what occurs, even though they may be paying taxes to that government group.

The rise of regional government comes at a time when taxpayers are already breaking under the strain of too much government in all shapes and sizes.

It isn't hyperbole to suggest that the combined taxation of government takes half the average taxpayer's income. This doesn't account for the impact of inflationary federal monetary policy or the inherited cost of new government regulation such as the impending draconian increase in utility rates which will be brought about by the federal government's newest scheme to regulate energy production.

If the federal government is a massive whale which seeks to swallow the taxpayer whole, the multitude of tax-hungry local government entities are the vicious piranhas which in the collective may do more harm to the taxpayer than the federal government. It has become hard to find a local government entity which isn't plotting and planning either a rate increase, tax increase or expansion of regulation. The last thing we need is a new set of regional government entities with their own taxing power. They may well be the proverbial last straw which breaks the camel's back.

Unfortunately, this sentiment wasn't shared by many others in the Legislature. House Bill 2480 will go into law notwithstanding the objection of 25 Representatives and 11 Senators.